For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.
It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.
How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."
A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.
Another cause for applause is the inclusion, for the first time, of Jeff Uniatowski's Mise (which made the top 10 list, nailing 25 points out of a possible 30 in the food rankings) and Doug Katz's Fire.
Of course, the footwork for Tim and Nina Zagat's annual poll is done not by professional critics or culinarians, but by tens of thousands of volunteer surveyors, "avid local restaurant-goers," as the Zagats describe them. (You, too, can join the crew; just log onto zagat.com to register.) Once the year's rating forms are turned in, local editors in each city help choose the restaurants to be listed and edit the survey results. (We can't tell you who Zagat's Cleveland editor is: Repeated e-mails and phone calls to the N.Y.C. office went unanswered.)
Among the survey's other weaknesses (lack of timeliness . . . the specter of possible ballot-box stuffing), this "review by anonymous committee" approach leads some critics and restaurateurs (us included) to view Zagat as more of a popularity poll than a serious critique. In Cleveland, for example, modest little Phnom Penh (which dishes out excellent, inexpensive Vietnamese and Cambodian fare) gets the same food rating (27 out of 30 points) as Paul Minnillo's Baricelli Inn, and for that matter, a higher food rating than Michael Symon's Lola Bistro. But if a visiting gourmet asked us to point him toward one of Cleveland's top restaurants (which is, after all, what the Zagat Survey claims it's all about), which one do you think we'd be more likely to choose?
This isn't to say that any of this year's listed restaurants don't deserve the props. But in culinary art, as in all art forms, popularity isn't the same as quality. For now, we'll take our Zagat ratings with a dash of salt.