Judge Nasty

It was sometime in the late '70s that Fred Kanter first met John Plough — a meeting that Kanter wishes never happened.

Plough, the Portage County prosecutor at the time, was trying a drug case in which Kanter was the defense attorney. "He was very low-key," Kanter remembers. "He was a very good lawyer — cool, calm, collected, at least in the courtroom."

After resolving the case amicably, the two started talking about their passion for the racetrack and the bar. They instantly became good friends. "He was fun in those day," Kanter says. "That's when he still ate red meat and drank. We were tight, tight friends."

Then, in 1988, Plough lost his job in the Democratic primary. He started a private practice.

Over the next decade, he and Kanter were connected at the hip. They hit the track, flew to Vegas, and closed down the bars. Their sons even played on the same baseball team, which Plough coached.

In 1999, Kanter fell on hard times. For years, he'd been paying an old lawyer friend and frat brother kickbacks in exchange for client referrals — a violation of the attorney code of ethics. The Ohio Supreme Court suspended him for two years.

That's when he got the idea that Plough should run for judge and hire him as his bailiff. "He had good ideas to make a complacent system less complacent," Kanter says. "So I just pushed him. I became his political consultant, his shrink, sounding board, whipping boy — you name it. And in exchange, I would get a job."

In 2004, Plough ran for a seat on the Portage County Domestic Relations Court. Of the three candidates, he came in dead last. "He just didn't have a good support system," Kanter says. "He's a consummate outsider. He refused to take campaign contributions from lawyers."

The following year, Plough ran again, this time for a seat on the Portage County Municipal bench. Plough's wife and Kanter were largely responsible for running the campaign. They touted his refusal to accept contributions from lawyers as a sign that he'd be an impartial and fair judge. He was the only candidate not recommended by the Portage County Bar Association. Rob Rosenberg, the former president, refuses to say why, but Plough says it was all about "politics; I didn't want to accept contributions from their members. I didn't want to be beholden to anyone. I look at it as a bribe."

It worked. He won the seat by more than 1,000 votes. "We were ecstatic," Kanter says.

As soon as Plough took his seat on the Kent Municipal Court, he began making massive changes — changes that would quickly earn him national headlines.

Kent is a place where drunk driving is more skill than crime, thanks to drink specials that keep the student body properly wasted. On the surface, Judge John Plough would seem to fit this environment. His buttoned-down appearance, accented by a scruffy mustache and a slight runner's frame, seems deceptively forgiving. One glance at his record, however, and it's clear he's not a fan of that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing.

As soon as Plough reached the bench, he got tough on drug and alcohol offenders. Those charged with DUIs were forced to wear alcohol-monitoring anklets even before they were convicted. Plough also sentenced all DUI offenders to a mandatory year of probation.

Defendants charged with domestic violence didn't have it any easier. Even if they pleaded not guilty, Plough would make it a condition of bond that they immediately attend anger-management counseling. "We weren't reinventing the wheel, but we felt like we were," Kanter says.

While some embraced Plough's tough-on-crime changes, many felt the judge had gone too far. This was municipal court, after all. Plough wasn't dealing with rapists and murderers. Those who came before him were mostly everyday people charged with minor missteps.

The Public Defender's office filed suit against Plough, claiming his bond conditions were unconstitutional. They argued that forcing defendants into anger management before trial was prejudicial. The court sided with Plough. "If I feel a person is a danger to the community, I can set conditions to [his bond]," he says.

Still, defense attorneys were worried that all defendants were guilty in Plough's mind, no matter what. It became a standing policy in the Public Defender's office to request a jury trial whenever possible.

His docket quickly filled up with twice the jury trials of the other two judges combined. Plough didn't have the manpower to manage so much work.

Having run on the promise that he'd cut costs, the judge had cut his staff in half. While the other two sitting judges had three full-time employees each, Plough had no court reporter, and his deputy bailiff was part-time. "We were buried in work," Kanter says. "We were short-staffed, and the docket was overflowing. People started complaining that they had to wait for hours before their case was heard."