Vote Here and Now for Best of Cleveland 2017®!
ME. your comment misses the detail that the mcdonald's proposed was only the mcdonald's at 7015 detroit moved over. there was going to be no gain of jobs for cleveland's west side. i will take mcdonald's word that there would be no loss of jobs with 2 different franchises (the other at 3211 clark--one mile) competing at close range. but regardless no new jobs.
and it is much more likely that those who work at the metro clinic will buy a hot dog at the inn or a beer at platform brewery or go to the west side market or rent or buy a house than those who would have worked at a mcdonald's there. as far as who would be "taking advantage of the prostitutes" there i will leave that to your judgment since you are interested in that.
the mcdonald's at fulton and lorain was stopped temporarily a few years ago, BHALLOHIO, it was not permanent. mcdonald's was appealing the zoning decision made by the city and it seemed that they were in for the long haul to try to put a drive-thru there. only the property owner now selling the site to someone else made it a permanent victory.
"In "Schooled," Eastman authors a red hot litany of encounters with students."
not at all. in the book, eastman has her main character met up with 2 former students now themselves college graduates. in short many years later. there is no "litany of encounters with students."
whoops, sorry Joe D, misread whose name goes where with the posts. you good.
my post was directed at kenrmer.
Joe D, your facts are not complete and are quite partisan. the mayor previous to dennis was selling off any item, not nailed down, in order to balance the budget of cleveland. because the previous mayor could not find ways to support the resources of cleveland, and because he was an early proponent of the no new taxes pledge, he gave the cleveland lakefront to the state in 1977-78, sold the old c.t.s. to the new regional r.t.a., sold the cleveland sewer system to the regional n.e.o.r.s.d. and those were just the big items. muny light, now cleveland public power, was next on the block to be sold when dennis became mayor. he refused. the 1/2% increase in the cleveland payroll tax was to balance a cleveland budget that was looking forward, under the previous mayor, to the receipts of another sale of cleveland resources--this time to a private corporation rather than to a regional agency. at best the sale would have been a very temporary patch in a long term problem.
dennis also wanted not to raise taxes, but when cleveland trust (later ameritrust, now a minor footnote in the history of key bank) as the lead cleveland bank refused to roll over the loans to city of cleveland--as they had done year after year under the previous mayor--he was forced to go for a tax increase. did i mention that cleveland trust had a people on the board of cleveland electric illuminating, the company that wanted to buy muny light, and c.e.i on the bank's board?
all the money from the .05% tax went to balance the budget of cleveland, not to muny light. it is to be noted that the next mayor, george voinovich added another .05% payroll tax on top of the .05% that dennis did: so you are paying 2% today.
businesses were moving out of cleveland before dennis, and they continued after dennis. his two years as mayor is not the cause of cleveland's problems. businesses will go where they will make money and moving from cleveland to mexico or singapore does not happen because of a mayor in office for but two years.
737 Bolivar Rd., Suite 4100
Cleveland, OH, 44115
Main: (216) 241-7550
Advertising: (216) 802-7241
All parts of this site Copyright © 2017 Cleveland Scene.
© 2017 Cleveland Scene:
737 Bolivar Rd.,
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.
Website powered by Foundation