Naturally, at the first opportunity I checked out "air bag" on Yahoo. There are numerous sites, practically all of which relate to disabling the air bags. The funny thing is that while it is possible to get the government's permission to do this, practically no dealer or garage will actually perform the operation. The other funny thing is that although we kill over 40,000 persons a year in vehicle accidents, I couldn't find any mention of how many were saved (or how many were killed) by the air bag.--Guyler Magruder, Singapore
No question, pops, it'd be a bummer to have a safety device that killed more people than it saved. But not to worry. If you buckle your seat belts, sit up straight, and put the kids in the backseat, the air bags will be perfectly safe. Of course, if you did all that, you wouldn't need air bags in the first place. OK, I'm exaggerating, but there's no denying that air bags have a catch-22 aspect.
First some numbers. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says that, as of September 1, 1998, air bags have saved 3,448 lives (2,954 drivers, 494 passengers) since they were first installed in quantity in the early '90s. During the same period 113 people (66 of them children) have been killed by air bags. So we're talking 30 lives saved for every one lost. It's estimated that air bags reduce the risk of dying in a direct frontal collision by 30 percent.
Some of these numbers are a little shaky. The NHTSA doesn't investigate every accident in which an air bag is deployed. The figure for lives saved was arrived at using a double-pair comparison study, which the agency describes as "a mathematical analysis of the real-world fatality experience of vehicles with air bags compared with vehicles without air bags." In other words, despite its seeming precision, 3,448 is an estimate. Some also argue that air-bag deaths are understated, since the figure includes only cases of low-speed accidents in which the air bag was clearly at fault.
Though 30:1 is a pretty favorable kill ratio, the fatalities show that air bags aren't the goof-proof passive safety devices some people thought they'd be. Thirty years ago Ralph Nader argued that people didn't use seat belts and that a passive system like air bags was the only answer. Even today, with mandatory seat belt laws, only about 65 percent of auto users buckle up. Air bags save a lot of the heedless types. According to the NHTSA, of the 3,448 people saved, 2,483 weren't wearing seat belts.
But you may argue: I use seat belts, and I insist that everyone in my car use them. Why should I be required to risk air-bag injury just to protect the mopes that can't be bothered? The NHTSA's answer is that air bags and seat belts combined offer more crash protection than either device individually. Most of the people killed by air bags fall into identifiable risk groups--kids in the front seat, for example. The NHTSA concedes that air bags make the front seat significantly more dangerous for those under 12. But if you're careful and put the kids in the back, etc., you can minimize the danger.
Admittedly some people do everything right and still get killed by air bags--to date, 11 belted adults. Many of these were short drivers who presumably sat close to the steering wheel and were hit by the air bag as it expanded. Short people are now eligible to have a switch installed that lets them disable the air bag.
But let's set aside the special cases. Air bags basically work and aren't the dangerous boondoggle that some folks think. Admittedly the "passive" aspect of air bags was oversold. The real lesson here is that it's impossible to design a safety feature so foolproof that you needn't get your mind in gear before you step on the gas.
Cecil Adams can deliver the Straight Dope on any topic. Write Cecil at the Chicago Reader, 11 E. Illinois, Chicago 60611, or e-mail him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.