Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club. Because No News is Bad News.

Saturday, March 28, 2009


Posted By on Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM

It’s anyone’s guess why cop cruisers in Cleveland, the largest city fleet in the state, still don’t have dash cams to protect officers — and their suspects — from false accusations.

Councilman Zack Reed says he’s been trying to get them installed from the time he was chairman of Council’s Public Safety Committee six years ago. Though he’s no longer in that post due to DUI troubles, the matter still seems to frustrate the current chairman, Councilman Kevin Conwell. Public Safety Director Martin Flask danced around the subject at Council’s last Public Safety meeting, saying that priority might be leaning toward the installation of more security cams. But with dash cams costing about $200 per cruiser, Reed doesn’t get it.

“Marty Flask and Chief [Mike] McGrath don’t want those cams and the question is, ‘Why?’” wonders Reed. “Steve Loomis [head of the police union] doesn’t have a problem with it. Officers don’t seem to have a problem, but when it comes down to somebody saying we’re going to use these dollars to put cams in the cars, for some reason, it doesn’t get done.”

It could be a useful tool — or a coffer-clearing one. Depends.

A few years back, a State Highway Patrol trooper shot a motorist who, he said, fired first. The dash cam proved that to be true.

In another incident, a little closer to home: Reed recalls a rash of shootings involving cops during Mayor Jane Campbell’s administration, five or six in a row. In one of the shootings, at East 151st and Kinsman in Reed’s ward, an old woman told police that she looked out her window and saw an officer tussle with a suspect, then shoot him. It turned out, after several witnesses were interviewed, that the officer was justified in shooting the man.

“My whole thing was then — and still is — that if we had a camera in that cop car, we wouldn’t have that kind of problem,” he says. “And it’s been at least six years since then.”

During budget talks last month, Flask told Council members about a pilot program that started two years ago in which some were mounted on cruisers in the 6th District. Reed asked for the results of the pilot and was told to keep waiting. He still is.

Of course, what goes unmentioned is how taped footage of officers doing the wrong thing wouldn’t exactly be helpful either.

The union did fight against the installation of vehicle locators, Reed said, but those have been installed (for about the same cost as the cams) on about half of the city’s fleet. The rest will be installed soon. But still no cams. And still no answers why. — Dan Harkins

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Cleveland Scene works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Cleveland and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Cleveland's true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

September 9, 2020

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.


© 2020 Cleveland Scene: 737 Bolivar Rd., Suite 4100, Cleveland, OH 44115, (216) 241-7550
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.

Website powered by Foundation