Support Local Journalism. Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Future of Cleveland's Traffic Cameras Up To City's Voters

Posted By on Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:33 PM


Cleveland voters will decide whether to continue with the city's scheme designed to fleece money from drivers under the guise of public safety or whether actual humans are needed to determine if an infraction actually occurred.

After more than 13,000 people signed a petition to the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, an amendment to the city's charter that would eliminate traffic cameras in Cleveland will be on the November ballot, per a story by NEOMG's Leila Atassi. The petition had more than double the amount of signatures needed to be placed on the ballot, Atassi notes.

At a special meeting of the Cleveland City Council today council members seemed dejected that citizens will have a say in the rules that govern them:

Council President Kevin Kelley told his colleagues Wednesday that state law requires them to honor the wishes of petitioners and approve the issue for the ballot — even if they "find the subject matter distasteful."

Some council members asked if they could speak against the issue. But Kelley told them to save it for Monday's regular council meeting.

Read Atassi's story here.

While you're at it, here's some further reading

-Chicago Tribune, July 14, 2014: "Red light cameras tag thousands for undeserved tickets"

Thousands of Chicago drivers have been tagged with $100 red light fines they did not deserve, targeted by robotic cameras during a series of sudden spikes in tickets that city officials say they cannot explain, a Tribune investigation has found.

-USA Today, March 18, 2014: "Red-light camera firms get heat over tickets"

Courts, government officials and motorists seeing red over traffic-light cameras are increasingly directing their fury toward the companies that sell the devices.

At issue: contracts that give companies up to half of ticket revenue and shortened yellow lights that catch more motorists., January 26, 2014: "Traffic enforcement cameras violate due process rights: Ohio Rep. Dale Mallory"

I firmly believe that red light cameras and speeding cameras are unnecessary and have failed the public. Originally instituted as a part of a “public safety initiative,” the traffic camera system has proven to be nothing more than a revenue-generating scheme designed to rob Ohioans of their living and violates the most basic fundamental rights of their due process.

Tags: ,

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

May 5, 2020

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.


© 2021 Cleveland Scene: 737 Bolivar Rd., Suite 4100, Cleveland, OH 44115, (216) 505-8199
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.

Website powered by Foundation