Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club. Because No News is Bad News.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Civil Suit Against Two Cleveland Cops in 2011 Shooting Death of Parma Man

Posted By on Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:04 AM

Daniel Ficker was shot and killed at his home in Parma on July 4, 2011, when two Cleveland police officers, one off duty, both out of their jurisdiction, came calling after Ficker was allegedly fingered as a suspect in a theft incident at a party earlier in the night. (The story was covered at length in a 2012 Scene feature story.)

Officer Matthew Craska shot the bullet that ended 27-year-old Ficker's life that night on his front lawn. Tiffany Urbach, Ficker's girlfriend and the mother of his two children, called 911 in the moments after the incident, and when EMS and Parma police arrived, wailed "You shot him!" The other officer involved, Dave Mindek, was off duty and had called Craska, based in the city's Second District, to help him confront Ficker.

Why did two Cleveland police officers go to a home in Parma to confront a suspect in an incident that happened in Parma?

There was a party at Mindek's house earlier that night. Urbach, Ficker's girlfriend, is cousins with Mindek's wife Kimberly. Kimberly had discovered her purse and thousands of dollars in jewelry were missing during the party. She reported the theft in a phone call to Cleveland police and identified Ficker as the likely suspect. She also told her husband, Dave Mindek.

Whatever drove Mindek to call Craska and head to Ficker's home, the events that transpired after that decision and Ficker's death are the subject of competing narratives. The officers claimed Ficker was the aggressor; Ficker's family claimed the officers showed up belligerent and quickly escalated the situation.

Craska was cleared of all wrong doing by a grand jury. Mindek was charged with dereliction of duty before being acquitted. 

Ficker's family and girlfriend filed a civil lawsuits against the officers and the city in 2012. The officers and the city, naturally, sought to dismiss those charges. Yesterday, a U.S. District judge ruled against their motion in a decision that pushes the case toward a trial, stating at various times that there's ample evidence for a jury to decide whether Ficker's rights were violated. 

Tags: , ,

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Cleveland Scene works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Cleveland and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Cleveland's true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

September 23, 2020

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.


© 2020 Cleveland Scene: 737 Bolivar Rd., Suite 4100, Cleveland, OH 44115, (216) 505-8199
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.

Website powered by Foundation