As I leave Malley’s and watch the familiar sign diminish behind me, I feel a peculiar mixture of privilege and loss. To live in a city where such chocolate exists is a small fortune. To recognize that one cannot belong to it entirely is a quieter sorrow, a grief that must settle without spectacle.
For many years my relationship with chocolate was uncomplicated. International brands filled ordinary spaces. Grocery lines, airport stores, conference snack tables. They were agreeable, reliable, designed to satisfy without asking anything in return. I accepted them as one accepts certain customs: useful, unquestioned, sufficient.
Malley’s existed in the background of my life long before I allowed myself to approach it closely. I knew its reputation. I remembered flavors that lingered longer than conversation. Textures that resisted quick conclusions. And surprisingly, while elegant and transformative, Malley’s is unassuming, humble, easy to access. But visiting the store itself felt like crossing an invisible boundary; stepping into a more particular world, one that invited attention rather than casual consumption. I arrived with a list of goals, gifts for others, but found myself mentally drafting a pros-and-cons table for personal consumption instead.
On a gray February afternoon, I entered with the intention of choosing a single elegant gift. The displays were arranged with calm assurance. Nothing felt extraneous. Each seemed to reveal a preference I had not yet admitted to myself. I experienced an unexpected sense of recognition, as though encountering something familiar yet newly significant.
The temptation was not excess but intimacy. The feeling that one could understand every variety, explore every possibility. For a brief moment I imagined a life organized entirely around Malley’s, a life of uninterrupted sweetness. Reason intervened quickly: health, balance, the ordinary structures that sustain a respectable existence.
Still, I lingered longer than intended. My fingertips moved across the displays with a care that surprised me. A quiet awareness traveled upward; physical, unmistakable, and difficult to justify. Language softened; time shifted. Eventually I left, not because desire faded but because I understood that certain experiences deepen when approached with restraint. I wondered if the clerk had ever witnessed someone tallying the calories of longing in real time.
In the weeks that followed, I returned to familiar routines. Commercial chocolate resumed its modest place in daily life, a reminder of equilibrium. Yet something had changed internally. The knowledge of Malley’s introduced a subtle tension. A private awareness that these vivid flavors existed.
Distance became an act of preservation. Occasional visits. Small boxes. Careful choices as if I were training for a disciplined life of chocolate austerity. The longing did not disappear; it matured into a quiet appreciation shaped by boundaries.
Some pleasures must remain partially unrealized to retain their meaning. Not because they are forbidden outright, but because their intensity would disrupt the fragile architecture of ordinary days. They remain part of the landscape: familiar, luminous, approached with gratitude and caution.
As the Malley’s sign disappears completely from view, I feel neither regret nor triumph. Only the calm recognition that certain attachments are sustained best through respectful distance. Known, cherished, and never allowed to overtake the life that surrounds them. A small box sits in the passenger seat, a quiet monument, and only later do I notice my vision blur slightly, as though the winter air had followed me into the car. I tell myself that the occasional Malley’s indulgence is sophisticated research, trusting my insulin to understand.
Subscribe to Cleveland Scene newsletters.
Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed
