Support Local Journalism. Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club.

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Lakewood Ends Pit Bull Ban and Proposes New 'Dangerous Dog' Policies

Posted By on Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:07 AM

click to enlarge GREG MURRAY
The ban on pit bull ownership in Lakewood will end, though there are a few caveats in the new legislation.

"The breed ban effectively ends today," Mayor Mike Summers wrote in an email to council members last week, "because I do not see the merits of enforcing a feature we are likely to eliminate in the near future." In effect, the ban on pit bull breeds would be replaced with some new regulations and "stricter consequences on owners for failure to maintain control of animals."

The move comes after months of concerted protest and vocal opposition to the breed-specific ban (although the opposition has indeed been present in the city from the get-go).

Still, though, the new ordinance language contains policies directed specifically at pit bull breeds (Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Pit Bull Terrier and American Staffordshire Terrier) and the canary mastiff. For example, a "dangerous dog" — specifically those breeds, according to the proposed law — must be muzzled when "off the premises of its owner." They must be walked by an adult at all times.

Only one such dog is allowed per household.

Those asterisks on the new dog law prompt concern from residents who've been watching this debate play out for the past year.

"This isn’t just about a blocky headed dogs," resident Greg Murray said at last night's council meeting. "This isn’t just about Charlie, Macie, Roscoe, Valentina. It’s about common sense laws. It’s about safety. It’s about respect. It’s about being a progressive lakewood. It’s about giving bite victims of any type of dog in lakewood the respect they deserve by taking safety seriously. It is the city’s job, along with it's residents, to create an environment through many different tools and avenues that says, 'We mean business when it comes to safety.' That hasn’t happened in 10 years and we didn’t make any headway with Friday’s proposal."

The ordinance has been referred to the city's Public Safety Committee.

Summers joined three council members in introducing the legislation and adding a look toward the impending debate: "We recognize that the proposed changes to this existing ordinance are the beginning of the legislative process. We four are not in full agreement regarding every component of the proposed changes and look forward to the legislative process that will follow."

Tags: , , ,

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at [email protected].

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

January 26, 2022

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.


© 2022 Cleveland Scene: 737 Bolivar Rd., Suite 4100, Cleveland, OH 44115, (216) 505-8199
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.

Website powered by Foundation