In 2017, Cleveland City Council rejected petitions seeking referendum on a deal authorizing public funds for the expansion and renovation of the Quicken Loans Arena. Council Clerk Patricia Britt (and the council leaders and lawyers hiding behind her name) argued then that the petitions violated the United States Constitution. That argument, which was a clear effort to stall and subvert citizen action, was ruled invalid by the Ohio Supreme Court.
Last week, City Council has rejected petitions yet again. This time, they’re arguing that the signatures submitted April 2nd by Cleveland Lead Advocates for Safe Housing (CLASH) seeking a ballot initiative for lead-safe housing legislation failed to include language required by the Ohio Revised Code.
It is true that the petitions failed to include the required language. CLASH admits that it made a mistake by not including an all-caps disclaimer — “WHOEVER COMMITS ELECTION FALSIFICATION IS GUILTY OF A FELONY OF THE FIFTH DEGREE” — but notes that the petitions did include additional election falsification language. The redundant requirements seem to have no purpose other than to complicate citizen-led initiative and referendum efforts.
CLASH acknowledges that the mistake likely means the law they wrote, which would require landlords to certify that their properties are “lead safe,” will not be placed on the November ballot.
But they argue that the City Charter, not the Ohio Revised Code, governs city council’s response.
The signatures had already been deemed sufficient by Council Clerk Pat Britt and the Cuyahoga County Board of elections, and the City Charter (sec. 54) states that the proposed ordinance must be submitted to City Council at its next Meeting — Monday night.
Per the Charter: “The Council shall at once read and refer the [ordinance] to an appropriate committee, which may be the committee of the whole. Provision shall be made for public hearings upon the proposed ordinance before the committee to which it is referred. Thereafter the committee shall report the proposed ordinance to the Council, with its recommendations thereon, not later than sixty days after the date on which the proposed ordinance was submitted to the Council by the Clerk.”
CLASH will gather to demand as much Monday.
Former City Councilman Jeff Johnson, who sponsored lead legislation in 2017, which went nowhere fast, and now is a CLASH leader, told Scene that he’s disheartened by the pattern of council leadership being dismissive of citizen action.
“There are members of CLASH who’ve been involved in all three of the recent citizen-led petition drives,” Johnson said Monday. “The $15 minimum wage, the Q Arena deal, and now lead. We’ve been through this process and we’ve seen council leadership, and the mayor’s office, act this way before. Kevin Kelly is at the heart of this. I’m speaking for myself, but I’ve been on the inside, and his behavior is absolutely unacceptable. He continues to be antagonistic to procedures outlined in the charter. He is openly antagonistic and dismissive of the process.”
Kelley, throughout, has maintained that the most effective way to deal with Cleveland’s lead crisis is through the city-formed Lead Safe Cleveland Coalition (LSCC), whose policy committee is actively at work on recommendations.
Johnson said that if Council refuses to certify the petitions, as CLASH believes they are required to do, a sitting council member could alternately sponsor the legislation. It could be introduced and amended in accordance with the city’s standard legislative practice.
“Our reaction is not to go away, but to double down on our belief that when citizens act, they should be listened to,” Johnson said. He added that CLASH members were committed to ending the lead crisis one way or another, and while he’s hopeful that a court of law would side with CLASH’s interpretation of the City Charter, he knew the coalition members would once again hit the streets to get signatures for a future ballot initiative if need be.
Sign up for Scene’s weekly newsletters to get the latest on Cleveland news, things to do and places to eat delivered right to your inbox.
This article appears in Apr 10-16, 2019.
Why dont they just get the ballot initiative to recall Taxin Jackson once and for all!!!
Until crooks like him and thief Budish are are finally recalled from office and sent right to jail, nothing will ever change around here!!!
I will once again point out since Allard deleted it that these CLASH people are communists using the lead issue as a means for wealth redistribution through your taxes being used to repair other peoples houses. Again, they use pictures of babies in their promotion of this issue to manipulate the emotions of the public. Again, communism is opposed to landlords so it’s no surprise that they would be going after them now.
Theses same people with media support will be screaming at you about the green new deal and how we all need to pay for modifications to other peoples homes because of climate change.
Scene is a bunch of censoring fascists. Hilarious that you can’t debate the comments calling out your biases, you can only delete. Fucking Cowards.
Author here. Just a note once again that t I don’t have anything to do with the comments. But what you’re calling censorship is a pretty standard comments policy, where abusive language is flagged and often pulled. (The only content that’s “censored,” so to speak, are web addresses. If what appears to be a web address shows up in a comment (think “h-t-t-p” or “w-w-w”), it’s automatically flagged and won’t show up. This is because we had so many bots pushing penis enlargement websites and stuff. Believe it or not, we’d love to encourage good-faith debate down here.) On many of my stories — feel free to check — there is language calling out me, my reporting, my credentials, my analysis. None of that’s removed.
I’m happy to discuss any issue with my stories with anyone, as I have for years in person, over email and on social media. My Twitter handle is @SceneSallard and my other contact info is in my bio. I try to be upfront about my biases and perspectives, which in this case I hope are clear: Democracy should be allowed to function, and efforts by elected leaders to systematically disempower the citizenry should be strenuously opposed.
Allard, you delete comments all the time because they go against your way of thinking. You’ve never even addressed the accusation that you use your platform as a writer at a formerly trusted and well established publication to attack our culture, race bait, attack people of European decendency, attack conservatives, push leftist policy, promote scandalous celebrities and confuse readers all because you are a communist or at least a socialist which is also a communist or a Marxist which is also a communist.