The public must never forget or let local elected leaders forget: The Q Deal was one of the ugliest and most dispiriting episodes in recent Cleveland history. With shocking clarity over multiple months, it demonstrated the lengths to which elected leaders would go to crush the will of the electorate at the behest of their private masters. For the privilege of mortgaging their constituents’ future, leaders ultimately sabotaged the most energizing grassroots coalition Cleveland had seen in decades.
The public was of course under zero obligation to pay a cent for upgrades at the Q, which owner Dan Gilbert had decided were urgently required to improve upon the arena’s global ranking in events per year and to land yet more significant events, (aka, a future NBA all-star game). This was mere months after the NBA Championship and the RNC in 2016. County Executive Armond Budish, Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson and City Council President Kevin Kelley bent over so far backwards to ratify the outrageous handout, despite overwhelming public opposition, that the Browns and the Indians couldn’t help but get the message: a precedent was being set. The floodgates were opening wider still.
Not only does the public do these teams the biggest favor of all by “owning” the facilities in which they play — a farce sold to the public as a benefit, but which actually just allows the teams to avoid paying property taxes on the buildings they inhabit, control, and vastly profit off of — the public is also responsible for all large capital expenditures and major repairs ($500,000+) at the facilities, per their lease agreements. These repairs and upgrades are paid for with Sin Tax dollars, though that well is virtually dry. In fact, the County borrowed $60 million in bonds as an advance on future Sin Tax revenue to pay for projects from 2015-2017. About $7 million per year now goes toward paying down principal and interest on those bonds alone.
The public is also still paying off cost overruns on the construction of the basketball arena from back in the early 90s (and will be until 2023). Long before that debt was paid off, leaders saw fit to encumber the public with a whole lot more debt. Various public revenue streams will be paying down Q Deal bonds from 2023 until 2034, downgrading the county’s bond rating in the process in light of the vertiginous load. The repayment projections also included admissions tax revenue from Cavs’ playoff games from 2017-2023, a shall we say dicey revenue stream.
There’s no question that Armond Budish will go down in history as one of the worst politicians in the region’s resplendent history of cowards, crooks and sycophants. And as he’s dealt with calamities at the County Jail and non-stop personnel scandals, he has continued to celebrate the Q Deal as one of the few bright spots of his ghastly tenure. Cleveland.com editor Chris Quinn does as well. Budish’s pride in the Q Deal is, by now, a very sad joke indeed.
But in 2018, as he was running for the term which would promptly reveal the terrifying scale of his ineptitude, Budish praised the Q Deal yet again, misrepresenting the financial arrangement to portray it as sound investment for the region. He even suggested that it was the kind of deal that the county [would] look to make with the Indians.
Well, the moment has come. With the Q Deal in the rearview, the county, alongside Gateway Development Corp., is now hunting for public subsidies to help pay for future renovations at Progressive Field, which the Indians can be counted upon to demand as part of negotiations when their lease expires in 2023. The Cavs got $70 million (what will amount to $160 million or more with interest payments) for a measly seven-year lease extension, the Indians might remember. We should get the same deal!
WKYC’s Mark Naymik reported that Gateway’s Board Chairman Ken Silliman approached JobsOhio for help — and was turned down — and had not ruled out the possibility of requesting an allocation from the state of Ohio’s two-year capital budget.
It’s still early. Who knows what elaborate levers our distinguished electeds and their advisers will attempt to pull in order to pay the Dolans their ransom. Equally unclear is what sorts of renovations will even be considered. The Indians have already used Sin Tax dollars for discretionary renovations — Scoreboard! Suites! — and have requested millions more to redo the stadium’s seating and buy new food service equipment.
Additional money is already being set aside in a special reserve that was created as part of the Q Deal, but — as we can see from Silliman’s recent efforts — leaders must know that the available supply won’t be enough to sate the appetite of the Indians, who just saw the Cavs get bushels of free money and no doubt want a roughly equivalent slice of the pie.
This is the same sort of corporate welfare that Cleveland residents have witnessed, with increasing dismay and disgust, for decades. As the majority of Cleveland’s adults are functionally illiterate and the majority of the Cleveland’s children live in poverty, watching millions of dollars being handed to sports owners for facilities used predominantly by suburban and exurban fans, with literally no questions asked, is disgraceful.
Most troubling of all, sports teams — which are corporations — are taking cues from their brethren, the likes of Amazon and Sherwin-Williams. They recognize that by dangling the possibility of a departure, they can squeeze public entities dry much more regularly (at least every time a lease is up for renewal!) and then get celebrated for staying put: what they almost always would have done anyway. This hostage dynamic is especially acute in Cleveland, where leaders have a ready supply of catchphrases and scare words about the Browns’ departure in ’95 that have successfully reduced the public to obedience and fear.
As an additional note of irony in the current situation, Indians co-owner and CEO Paul Dolan happens to be the board chairman of the United Way of Greater Cleveland, an organization making bold pronouncements about its laser-focused commitment to poverty. In an interview on WCPN Thursday, United Way’s President and CEO Augie Napoli suggested, correctly, that advocating for policy solutions was more effective than writing a check when it came to making a dent in poverty.
One of the most straightforward policies for which he might consider lobbying against is the one where we use vast quantities of public money — which might otherwise have gone to infrastructure, public safety, health and human services or anything else that might elevate the quality of life for Cleveland’s poor and vulnerable — to fund stadiums for billionaire owners.
***
Sign up for Scene’s weekly newsletters to get the latest on Cleveland news, things to do and places to eat delivered right to your inbox.
This article appears in Feb 26 – Mar 3, 2020.


Not to worry…once again, all thief Budish has to do is put yet another ma$$ive property tax levy for us struggling homeowners to fork over to the billionaire sports teams and their billionaire owners!!!
Once again, until crooks like him and Taxin Jackson are finally, and forcibly, removed from office, nothing will ever change around here except paying more and more and more taxes for more and more and more of their never ending shenanigans and blatant waste of taxpayer money again and again and again!!!
That levy $$ is needed to pad the bottom line of Metro Health, to the tune of $34 Million annually. Those large executive bonus and pay raises don’t come out of thin air.
All the more reason to Vote NO on Issue 33 in March. It’s yet another property tax renewal and increase in disguise!
I’m so glad I live in Medina County, Cuyahoga county is a joke and so are the people that live there you vote for these fools use deserve to pay all the tax dollars you reap what you sow
cleveland is another of many
democrat run hellholes
vertiginous great word. However, before condeming the “big corporate interests” have you done the math to determine if it was a worth wile investment for the tax payers. I don’t care if the owners get a tax break, does it increase revenue to the NE Ohio area. This article was only presenting one side. If it is a win-win, why would that be bad. If tax payers are getting hosed, please point out the pros and cons of both sides.
I have to agree with Bill. This article hits a few points but is totally one sided. I moved from Cleveland 3 years ago to Washington DC and have seen first hand how the bigger cities operate. Development brings in more money and the Q upgrade was needed in order to stay competitive with other Arenas around the country. The arena really did not see any major upgrades since the 90’s besides to the team shop and jumbotron. People in Cleveland tend to get stuck with small town thinking and thats why its hard at times for the city to move forward. I promise, if downtown keeps going in the direction it is, the neighborhoods will eventually start to see the benefits from the economic success. If you build up the core (downtown) sprawl will naturally take place. It just takes time. NW DC is an excellent example of the start of success for a city.
How can people forget the deal that they made for the casino. They made a tax to build a new casino and then kept the money. The casino now was only suppose to be temporary until a new one was built. Hmmm still no new casino and no refunds were ever given back for the people who was taxed for it.
What does his ethnicity have to do with anything at all, or the price of face masks in China? And that old line about Jewish people being disproportionately overrepresented in politics and media is straight out of Adolf’s playbook. Maybe THAT is why you keep getting deleted.
Dumbest, lamest, stupidest headline that SCENE has ever used. EVER.
YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK!
You, sir, are a shtick dreck.
One of the most disturbing facts about our capitalist nation is the
misappropriation of funds directed to the salaries of entertainers.
Everyone should agree that the value an athlete, movie star, talk-show host,
team-owner, etcetera brings to the average citizen is very small. Granted,
they do offer a minuscule of diversion from our daily trials and
tribulations as did the jesters in the king’s court during the middle ages.
But to allow these entertainers to horde such great amounts of wealth at the
expense of more benevolent societal programs is unacceptable.
They do not provide a product or a service so why are they rewarded as such?
Our society is also subjected to the “profound wisdom” of these people
because it equates wealth with influence. Perhaps a solution to this
problem and a alternative to defeated school levies, crumbling
infrastructures, as well as all the programs established to help feed,
clothe and shelter those who cannot help themselves would be to tax this
undeserved wealth. Entertainers could keep 1% of the gross earnings reaped
from their endeavor and 99% could be deposited into the public coffers.
The old ideas of the redistribution of wealth have failed, and it is time to
adapt to modern-day preferences. People put their money into entertainment
above everything else; isn’t it time to tap that wealth? Does anyone think
this will reduce the quality of entertainment? It seems to me that when
entertainers received less income, the quality was much higher.