
T.J. Dow – Ward 7
Mike Polensek – Ward 8
Kevin Conwell – Ward 9
Jeff Johnson – Ward 10
Brian Cummins – Ward 14
It’s not much, but it’s something. The above six councilmen voted “NO” to suspend council’s rules at Monday night’s council meeting. That means that ordinance 305-17, known among its exponents as the Quicken Loans Arena Transformation deal, couldn’t be passed as an emergency measure. Council would have required 12 votes to pass on a second reading.
What does that actually mean for the future? Council will now vote on the deal on a third reading, at next week’s council meeting. It will likely pass 11-6 (or 12-5, if, as one City Hall staffer speculated, councilman Zack Reed flips).
Council President Kevin Kelley told Scene Monday evening, prior to the meeting, that council has heard as much as it’s going to hear about the Q deal in committee — the finance committee heard testimony Monday afternoon after two previous meetings of the Planning, Development and Sustainability committee — and that the benefit of passing the legislation on emergency, in his mind, was that it would be effective immediately.
It would not, Kelley said, affect the possibility of a voter referendum on the issue. There is nothing specifically in the City Charter that precludes the possibility of a referendum, whether the legislation was passed on emergency or not. There was some chatter earlier in the day that the deal’s pro-side wanted it passed on emergency to make a voter referendum more difficult.
Jeff Johnson spoke at the council meeting, a speech — like most of his speeches these days — that doubled as a campaign oration, directed squarely at Frank Jackson. He called into question the Mayor’s “deafening silence” on the arena issue since the initial December press conference. (Councilmembers have told Scene that Jackson knows the issue is “toxic” and doesn’t want his name associated with it.) Kelley told Scene, however, that he thought there was nothing unusual in the Mayor’s absence at council committee hearings. Other than during budget proceedings, it’s not the mayor’s custom to appear before council.
Johnson said there were “dark clouds” and “discontent” swirling through the city. He said there was “something deceptive” in the fact that the city campaigned so hard for Issue 32, the income tax increase, while actively negotiating the deal. Ken Silliman, on Monday afternoon, disputed that the city was actively negotiating the Q deal during the campaign for the tax increase, saying that Jackson wasn’t directly involved until the “latter half” of November, 2016.
Councilman Mike Polensek, who’s been vocal in his opposition, spoke Monday evening as well. He said he was encouraged by the energy of the debate, and said he believed this was an opportunity for Cleveland to survey more closely past and future “deals.”
“This is the people’s house,” Polensek said, of City Hall. And to those who have come to meetings to speak in support of or in opposition to the deal: “Do not be dismayed. Believe it or not, you do have a voice. We hear you.”
This article appears in Apr 5-11, 2017.

Seriously, can someone please look into Maime Mitchell, Ward 6….. as her constituents we do not support the Q deal but she is just doing what she is told to do by other powers. She has very serious dimentia and when you talk to her you it’s clear she really shouldnt be working. It’s very sad. She needs an advocate, she needs to step down. Someone needs to raise awareness about her illness and help her! She is hurting us and herself.
“There was some chatter earlier in the day that the deal’s pro-side wanted it passed on emergency to make a voter referendum more difficult.”
When one thing like this comes up, you normally shake your head and dismiss it. When something like this seems to come up time, and time, and time again, then you know that something is up. What we’re being fed about this is about as far from the truth as it can be. The Cavs know that all these upgrades could be bought and paid for on much better terms for the city, but this is what the Cavs want because it’s best for them. As far as I’m concerned, this is a business proposal, and do you really think the Cavs are going to give us on first draft their best offer? Absolutely not. So just like in any negotiations, reject this offer, and send them back a counter. Here’s what we want to do, here are our terms. If you want the city to play ball, it should be beneficial for the city because it really is beneficial, not just because you make it look beneficial with the numbers you pull from who knows where.
How much are the Cavs offering to get another vote? They must have been embarrassed Monday night not having this deal signed, sealed and delivered, Mr. Kelley.
Please read Councilman Polensek’s righteous comments on why this is a bad deal for the people of Cleveland: http://havecoffeewillwrite.com/?p=55400
His best shot against those pushing the $88 million in city taxes: “The people with cups on Public Square have more credibility with me.”
Roldo Bartimole