Former Councilman Jeff Johnson at a CLASH press conference. Credit: Sam Allard / Scene
In a letter filed yesterday, Cleveland Lead Advocates for Safe Housing (CLASH) demanded that Cleveland Law Director Barbara Langhenry compel city council clerk Patricia Britt to accept the 6,350 signatures that CLASH submitted last month with the hopes of putting a lead-safe ordinance on the November ballot.

Those signatures were rejected by council because the petitions failed to include an all-caps disclaimer about election falsification required by the Ohio Revised Code.

CLASH has maintained, and reiterated in its letter to Langhenry, (attached below), that the City Charter, not the Ohio Revised Code, dictates the local government response. It has cited numerous legal precedents, including the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in the Q Deal referendum dispute, to argue that Britt must accept the petitions, regardless of their form or substance. 

“If there had ever been any doubt,” the letter states, “the Supreme Court’s decision in [the Q Deal case] makes clear that the Clerk must accept the petitions and perform her duties in determining the sufficiency of the signatures.”

The letter was signed by attorneys Marc Dann and Donna Taylor-Kolis, from the Dann Law Firm, whom CLASH has retained as legal counsel.

“Our hope is that the Council Clerk and Law Director will do the right thing so that we can avoid the time and expense of seeking a Writ of Mandamus,” said Dann, in a statement provided to the press.

CLASH said that if Langhenry refuses to compel Britt to accept the signatures and refuses to file a Mandamus action in court to force her hand, then CLASH would do so itself, a procedure that it says is allowed under state and local laws.

Just like in the Q Deal case, CLASH has officially requested that they be named defendants in any Mandamus action against Britt so that they can present material to the court. 

This legal action runs parallel to the Lead Safe Cleveland Coalition (LSCC) effort. Monday, that public-private group presented 33 recommendations to City Council to help local lawmakers craft their own ordinance. These recommendations hew closely to CLASH’s proposal but fail to include a few key provisions, including a requirement that Day Care Centers be subject to a lead-safe mandate. 

Sam Allard is a former senior writer at Scene.

2 replies on “CLASH Lawyers Up, Demands that City Accept Lead Safe Petitions”

  1. And to think that tax in Jacksonville do anything about this at all??? The only thing hell do is raise taxes yet again and ask property owners and those that actually have to work and earn a living in this corruption filled, outrageously high taxed city and county!!!

    Until crooks like Taxin Jackson and thief Budish are finally recalled from office and sent right to jail, nothing will likely never change around here except paying more and more taxes and fees to the city and county for their continual corruption and utter waste of taxpayer money!!!

Comments are closed.