Credit: (Erik Drost/Flickr)

COLUMBUS, Ohio – Republican state lawmakers are working to move a controversial clean-energy bill quickly through the Ohio Legislature.

House Bill 6 would create the Ohio Clean Air Program, which would offer incentives to build and maintain power-generating facilities with zero- or reduced carbon emissions. A co-sponsor, Rep. Shane Wilkin, R-Hillsboro, said current mandates to pay for clean-energy and energy-efficiency programs would become optional, saving customers money.

“As things ebb and flow, and costs rise and lower for different forms of electric and generation,” he said, “it’s going to give us a balance here in Ohio that’s going to set us apart.”

Customers would pay an extra $2.50 a month for the new program, but Trish Demeter, chief of staff for the Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund, argued that it’s a bailout for FirstEnergy Solutions’ two unprofitable nuclear plants in northern Ohio.

“Maybe those plants do bring some environmental value, but we could create so many more jobs if we were to retain Ohio’s efficiency and renewable standard,” she said, “so the devil is in the details. We are highly speculative.”

The two plants could qualify for nearly half of the 300-million dollars expected to be generated annually by the new surcharges. The bill was introduced Friday; a House subcommittee hears testimony today.

Demeter contended that the bill jeopardizes the benefits of renewables and energy-efficiency standards, as well as nearly 112,000 clean-energy jobs.

“These are standards that are delivering utility-bill savings to customers, to the tune of $4.5 billion over the last decade,” she said, “and have resulted in the creation of new jobs across the state.”

Supporters want House Bill 6 passed by the end of June, but Demeter cautioned against swift action.

“We urge the sponsors and committee members to take this issue slowly,” she said, “and really do a full assessment of what the potential impacts of this bill could be – to our health, to jobs, and to the economy.”

FirstEnergy Solutions, which had announced it would close the two nuclear plants by 2021, praised the bill’s sponsors. While denying the program is a bailout, House Speaker Larry Householder, R-Glenford, told reporters that lawmakers should help save the plants.

The text of HB 6 is online at legislature.ohio.gov.

3 replies on “Groups say Ohio Clean-Energy Bill Disguised as Nuclear-Plant Bailout”

  1. So, the truth comes out. The only true clean energy is Nuclear. You cried Global Warming from fossil fuels and someone is solving your problem. The problem was never about fossil fuels or the Great Global Warming hoax, it was about regulation, taxation, complication and redistribution.

    You cannot hide your ill intentions any longer. Such hypocrisy, but in your eyes the ends justify the means.

  2. Well, and guess who gets left holding the bag once again Thats right, the taxpayers!!!

    Are you not sick of the already doubled and tripled water and sewer bills, the 50% income tax hike that Taxin Jackson swindled on the workers from a few years ago of which weve seen no results whatsoever. And how about the latest ma$$ive property tax hikes with the recent property tax increase revaluations???

    Its time to move out of Cuyahoga county, if not the state of Ohio all together and go somewhere where its much more affordable, and hopefully they have less thieving politicians in their local offices!!!

  3. Clean air? Have you seen the skies? Everyday it’s overcast with fake clouds sprayed from geoengineering jets. Oh look I can see one now and another and another and another and oh look another thick white streak from an unmarked little jet, oh theres another, oh this ones criss crossed, oh look that one’s flying straight up and looks like it’s going to crash into those other 6. Oh look the sun’s blocked from all the “vapor trails” just like the Geoengineering scientists said they were going to do.

Comments are closed.