An anonymous caller, in response to the 2007 Art Modell Awards… I just read your article about those Modell Awards in the Scene magazine. First and foremost, I think you went a little too easy on Martin Sweeney and those three a-holes they call the county commissioners. If you’re gonna bash those four people, you really should bash them with the intent of bashing them. Okay? There’s really nothing funny about those four dickheads. It’s serious business. All four of them all deserve to have their thumbs taken out of their ass and taken to school.
Let me just get down and dirty: Those four guys are fucking assholes. They don’t deserve any kind of print in any kind of magazine. Okay? You’re wasting your time and your talents on those four fucking assholes. But in the future, if you need to bash those four fucking assholes, do it right. Do it the right way.
Thank you, sir.
This article appears in Jan 9-15, 2008.
Getting Dad from September of 2007.
I am amazed at how blind the readers are to the truth. Does anyone have the ability to read between the lines anymore. This “attorney” has denied everything he was accused of and has used the media and his money to beat the system. OJ was found not guilty too, does that mean he didn’t do it? Dan Roth has denied using cocaine even though the government found it in his system, he has denied the incident that the other woman has accused him of, the Willoughby police believed he was a liar, he was accused of being abusive to his wife, and the government seized a large gun collection from him as well. Perhaps like OJ he will write a book in the future entitled “If I did it” and then he will be arrested for something serious like OJ was. Your readers are as dumb and blind as that jury was. The question everyone should be asking is what was this 60 year old man doing at a carnival in the first place. The justice system is designed to give justice according to the depths of your pocket, apparently this lawyer had some money and influence just like OJ, Michael Kennedy Smith, and all the others who beat serious charges who have money and influence. This article seems very one sided. Why was Colleen, Jeffrey and the rest involved not given the opportunity to give their version of what happened. I would venture to say that the writer of this article did nothing to even verify Mr. Roth’s story. I recently learned that Scene Magazine is in the same office building as Dan Roth’s office too. I wonder if they knew him or owed him a favor? Hmmm, I wonder how much legal work he has done for your magazine? I bet if people dug a little deeper and refused to accept the surface version they would find a lot more dirt on the Daniel Roth character. Wake up people, it is this type of lawyer and father that has contributed to greatly to the fall of society. And you sheep are following the same path. You should be ashamed.