Picture_2021.png

By: Ralph E. Shaffer

The experts are wrong. Ohio is not the key to the White House. Mitt Romney may lose without Ohio, but history shows he could also lose despite winning the state.

Since the first Republican ran for President and carried Ohio in 1856 (he lost the election, by the way), 16 different Republicans have taken Ohio and been elected President. But in that same period, five Republican candidates won Ohio’s electoral vote and still lost the election. Romney could be the sixth.

Weakening Romney’s chance of election even further, those five losing Republicans who won Ohio were, like Romney, not Ohioans. Romney’s chances would be better had he moved from Michigan to Ohio instead of Massachusetts — although he’s spent so much time in Ohio these last few weeks, he might have a claim to residency there.

Until the Great Depression, Ohio was not a “battleground” in most presidential elections. (What ever happened to the phrase “swing states”? Perhaps a condition of perpetual warfare has shaped our terminology.) The state went Republican in every Presidential contest from 1856 until 1932, with the exception of Woodrow Wilson’s two wins.

Beginning with Franklin Roosevelt’s first victory in 1932, Ohio has split its votes evenly between Republicans and Democrats, each party winning 10 of 20 elections held from that date until now. For 80 years Ohio has been a swing state, usually swinging to the side that takes the Presidency.

Does that make Ohio something special? Just ask Californians. Neither Romney nor the President has made any significant appearance in that state other than to raise money, lots of it. Nor have they spent any of their advertising money on TV or radio commercials in California. Why? Because California in recent years has been as attached to one party, the Democrats, as Ohio once was to Republicans.

Well, not quite. No one has yet come up with a rule that ties a Democratic victory to a win in California. It’s time to shelve that “No Republican has won without Ohio” canard. It belongs with that other slogan that voters got sick of hearing: “As Maine goes, so goes the nation.” – Ralph E. Shaffer, Covina, CA, Covina, CA

Vince Grzegorek has been with Scene since 2007 and editor-in-chief since 2012. He previously worked at Discount Drug Mart and Texas Roadhouse.

7 replies on “The Weekly Beef: Enough About Ohio”

  1. Yes…Lets direct the advertisers attention away from Ohio finally….God what I wouldn’t give to see a Serpentini commercial right about now…

  2. Okay, so five Republicans have won Ohio but lost the ballgame (I know offhand that Nixon was one of them, but not the other four). But two Democrats have lost Ohio and still won the election…FDR in 1944 and JFK in 1960 (vs. Nixon). I still think Obama is gonna win Ohio, though…at one point, early voters were voting Democratic by a 2-1 margin.

    Chuckles the Clown

  3. Here’s the complete list: Five Republicans who took Ohio…but lost the election to the Democratic candidate…

    1960: Nixon over JFK
    1944: Dewey over FDR
    1892: B. Harrison over G. Cleveland
    1884: Blaine over G. Cleveland
    1856: Fremont over Buchanan

    The Ohio winner has won the Presidency in 24 of the last 26 contests (see 1944 and 1960, above). That’s a pretty damn good track record.

    Chuckles the Clown

  4. Ohio is awesome. I’ll gladly take the money you want to stupidly spend on advertisements that I ignore!

Comments are closed.