The 650 young pros who participated, 86 percent of whom were white and 75 percent of whom were women, noted that they wanted to be more involved in civic leadership but felt hampered by existing demands on their time and by an old guard unwilling to relinquish power. They pegged the region’s low cost of living and “natural assets” as the region’s top strengths.
The nonprofit Engage! Cleveland conducted the survey via email over a three-week span in June. Consultants at ERC compiled and analyzed the quantitative and qualitative data. The report summarizing findings was transparent about the survey’s demographics and methodology.
While the survey was not at all representative of the population at large — 90 percent of respondents held a Bachelors degree or better; 60 percent made more than $50,000 per year — the results nevertheless echoed broad-based concerns about the region’s leaders.
Last month, at the City Club, participants in a live poll (the majority of whom were under 44 and about a quarter of whom were black) were asked to name the region’s top challenges. Eight of the 11 top responses had to do with stagnant or disengaged leadership.
According to the respondents in the Engage! Cleveland survey, leadership woes afflict both the public and private sectors. In fact, not a single respondent selected “Government” as one of the region’s top-three assets from a list of about 15.
“I honestly feel like the only thing holding YPs back is local government and their own interests in simply being re-elected and in power,” one respondent said. “We need a leadership change immediately.”
But Cleveland’s private web of civic leaders was repeatedly mentioned as an insular group that’s biased against younger people and new ideas.
“This a do-your-time city,” said one respondent. “Many older professionals are myopic and reluctant to relinquish any power. They will relegate you to a junior board, with little to no input.”
Respondents were given the chance to identify priority areas that would specifically help attract and retain young professionals. Employment opportunities, economic development and public transportation were the top three.
Full report here:
This article appears in Sep 12-18, 2018.
Read it again, doofus…the survey was not at all representative of the population at large. It really has nothing to do with either racism or “anti-white bias “…a non-existent menace that you see under every rock and under every tree…when the truth is, you are just a hater who doesn’t like SCENE, its staff, its politics, or its readership. Just another excuse to bitch at the SCENE…you could care less about the survey…which is a flawed joke, and not worth writing about.
Why? Because…
The non- profit surveyed a mere 650 young professionals… both a ridiculously tiny sampling and a teeny-tiny fraction of the people who live in Cleveland. Also a very small and narrow sliver of the Cleveland demographic: 86 % white, 75 % female, 90% with a BA or higher, 60% earning more than $50,000 per year –and yet this is supposed to show “a broad-based concerns about the regions leaders? Are they serious?
Now stick to what you know best…harassing BJ and the other staffers you hate so much.